interaction of organisational structure and humans in knowledge integration
Read Online

interaction of organisational structure and humans in knowledge integration by Oliver Krone

  • 941 Want to read
  • ·
  • 23 Currently reading

Published by University of Lapland in Rovaniemi, Finland .
Written in English


  • University of Lapland -- Dissertations.,
  • Business planning.,
  • Knowledge management.,
  • Management information systems.,
  • Information resources management.

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementOliver Krone.
SeriesActa Universitatis Lapponiensis -- 115
ContributionsUniversity of Lapland.
LC ClassificationsHD30.28 .K755 2007
The Physical Object
Pagination273 p. :
Number of Pages273
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL16749388M
ISBN 109524840928
ISBN 109789524840927
LC Control Number2007438375

Download interaction of organisational structure and humans in knowledge integration


  Integration involve allocation of job function and administrative mechanism through control and integration of job activities. Furthermore, centralization organization structure is the extent of. Hypothesis 1. The degree of innovative and cooperative climate is positively related to social interaction. Organizational structure Besides organizational climate, organizational structure is also likely to affect the social interaction among organizational members. Organizational structure is usually categorized into three elements including. tional structure that allows the integration of employees and departments of an organization (Andrews and Kacmar, ; human action and results from the interaction of insights, judgment and intuition about information, being influenced organizational structure and knowledge. The book indicates how people, culture, technology, strategy, leadership, operational management, process and organisational structure issues all have an impact on the implementation of knowledge management in an organisation.

An organization is defined as a collection of people who work together to achieve a wide variety of goals. Organizational behavior is defined as the actions and attitudes of people in organizations. The field of organizational behavior (OB) covers the body of knowledge derived from these actions and attitudes. Impact of Organizational Structure on Knowledge Management in the Jordanian show that knwolodege is different from the data and information, because the human factor in knowledge constitutes a key element books contain a collection of information that becomes knowledge is an institutional process aimed at coordination and integration of. maintain innovative competitiveness. Organization and communication structures that encourage and make use of experience-based learning, knowledge sharing, and interaction – such as project teams, problem solving groups, and task rotation – can contribute positively to the performance of innovative activities (Jensen et al., ). Introduction. Humans interact with computers in many ways; the interface between humans and computers is crucial to facilitate this p applications, internet browsers, handheld computers, ERP, and computer kiosks make use of the prevalent graphical user interfaces (GUI) of today. Voice user interfaces (VUI) are used for speech recognition and synthesizing systems, and the.

Early organizational theorists broadly categorized organizational structures and systems as either mechanistic or organic. 22 This broad, generalized characterization of organizations remains relevant. Mechanistic organizational structures (Exhibit ) are best suited for environments that range from stable and simple to low-moderate uncertainty (Exhibit ) and are characterized by top-down. The research sets out to investigate whether the organisational structure of an organisation impacts on the ability of the organisation to share knowledge. The research was limited to a single case study of an organisation in the telecommunications industry with a matrix structure and strong requirement for knowledge integration. knowledge structure. The Knowledge Management (KM) model and experiences CG and E&Y followed before the acquisition were substantially different in terms of organizational structure, technological platforms and contribution mechanisms. KM at Cap Gemini was more decentralized than in E&Y. One of the key success factors at E&Y is knowledge structure. Search the world's most comprehensive index of full-text books. My library.